H J Heinz Deli Mayo UK Gay Kiss Advert Fiasco
H J Heinz has mayonnaise all over its face after running and then pulling what is a rather poor advert that ~gasp~ features the ultimate shock and horror (please note my sarcastic tone) of two men 'kissing'. Petitions have started and the Heinz phone line is receiving more than a few angry calls.
So, whats this all about?
Short, sweet and rather stupid, I missed the point for ages. No, the advert is short, sweet and rather pointless! I have a point despite being short and sweet.
In the UK, The Guardian covers the story and tells us that:
The TV advert is the first by Heinz's new ad agency AMV BBDO since it won the £10m-a-year UK business last year. AMV BBDO said that the concept behind the campaign is that the product tastes so good, "it's as if you have your own New York deli man in your kitchen".Well, call me thick, but I never got that message from the advert until until I read that. I just thought that the British 'dad' had a weird taste in partners and was in a Civil Partnership with a guy in a hat with a bad accent!
But some 200 souls have complained to the Advertising Standards Authority, the body that controls advertising in the UK, about the advert. Apparently they failed to spot the humour and some idiots decided it was offensive because it meant that parents had to explain homosexuality to kids. As if "That's so GAY!" wasn't heard in year one playgrounds!
As The Guardian says:
Are you listening now, Nigel?"It is our policy to listen to consumers. We recognise that some consumers raised concerns over the content of the ad and this prompted our decision to withdraw it," said Nigel Dickie, director of corporate affairs for Heinz UK.
Dickie added that the campaign, which was due to run for five weeks, was meant to be humorous and that the company apologised to anyone who felt offended.
But Heinz has the Deli Mayo on its face. What's happened so far:
- Folks have found the H J Heinz Customer Service line and made use of it, either by using the form, or by calling 0800 528 5757 (UK only I imagine)
- Nigel Dickie of Heinz was quoted in The Guardian. Folk have been emailing Nigel directly at Nigel.Dickie@uk.hjheinz.com but Facebook has also published his full contact details including cellphone. Not, I think, a great day for Nigel!
- There is a petition addressed to Heinz at http://www.petitiononline.com/heinz with (as I write this) 1,101 signatures and rising (against 200 or so complaints)
- There is a Facebook Group (you need to be a member of Facebook to see it I think) with (as I write) 498 members and rising calling for Heinz to reinstate the advert.
OK, some may think this is all an over-reaction. But, the way I see it,One should ask "Who would spend all that money on an advert just to get any sort of publicity, however bad?"
either this is a cynical marketing ploy, in which a "dangerous gay" commercial was shown, anticipating a reaction from bigots and homophobes which would incite debate to get their product noticed, and they always intended to pull the advert to increase the furore
or a major international company has cravenly caved in to a very small number of bigots.
Neither of these is really acceptable, and if it takes a legion of furious fags, friends, families and fellow-travellers to show both Heinz and other multinationals that the time is long past when we'll meekly stand for this, well, that's what it takes and count me in!
But thsi could be an excellent use of Viral Marketing - Just look at the coverage it's getting!
One of my friends in the USA said:
I signed the complaint. I just wonder if they remember Anita Bryant and the orange juice fiasco. The gay community banded together and ruined her career.I had to find out who Anita Bryant is. Wikipedia told me. It seems she has grown up a lot but was homophobic. According to the article there her hate campaigns caused sales of Florida Orange Juice to slump, and, according to The St Petersburg Times, caused her bankruptcy and her career to fail.
And H J Heinz, knowingly or unknowingly, has angered not only the pink pound, but a very large number of folk indeed.
But the advert was fatuous, and pretty poor. It was a very bad decision to run it at all. But, having run it, it was a very bad decision indeed to pull it from the airwaves because 200 petty minded bigoted idiots complained.
The brand damage is already significant. The power of an internet army is immense. Heinz may not be reeling yet, but it will be hurting.
And I bet Nigel Dickie's cellphone will be red hot.

6 comments:
Neither of these is really acceptable, and if it takes a legion of furious fags, friends, families and fellow-travellers to show both Heinz and other multinationals that the time is long past when we'll meekly stand for this, well, that's what it takes and count me in!
Professionals are saying:
"Apparently in Britain Heinz Deli Mayo can turn any average "mum" into a great deli guy. Who gets kissed by dad going out the door. Which then sparks protests from TV viewers who don't get the ad. Which cause the ad to be passed all over the internet for commentary or cries of outrage.
All of which makes people talk a lot about Heinz mayo. Well played, by Heinz's new agency AMV BBDO."
I also feel that by 'apologising for any offence' and 'withdrawing' the ad, Heinz have probably improved their position amongst their target customers by appearing to be guardians of "wholesome family values", which promotes the brand/product as 'Wholesome' and 'good' for the family (i.e. kids)...
When infact the ad is banned from being shown during the time kids watch TV... because it is UNHEALTHY... full of fat and salt etc...
I'm just a little disturbed that they wern't bothered about the damage a public apology might do, for reinforcement of anti-gay prejudices...?
Hi Tim, very good article here.
I remain of the opinion that it's a lot of fuss over not very much but I like how you pick apart the suggestion that it's a ruse to increase media presence by Heinz.
Given the 'Florida Orange juice' debacle then you're right that this was a poor tactic, if that was the thinking behind it in the first place.
But Facebook groups, parliamenary motions, petitions, bombarding of company phone lines etc is a prime example of an over-top-militance that is becoming commonplace in the gay community.
Yes, of course they have a genuine beef, in this circumstance and in many others, but it seems there is a staggering overreaction being played out here.
Heinz are a private company and they can air what they like.
And who should be demonised more? Heinz for at least considering running such an advert or the thousands of other companies who wouldn't touch the idea with a bargepole?
In reply to the three foregoing comment, and more as a generalised reply than a specific, I think we can say with confidence that this is a storm in a teacup. But the problem for Heinz is that they caused the storm and chose a position of prominence for the teacup.
I really don't think they were brave to run it. I think its message was oversold by the new agency. Oversold? Well, yes. I'm reasonably bright and never spotted the alleged message.
Specifics:
@tony lowe: I nearly canned (pun intended) your comment because it feels like linkspam to your Multi Level Marketing business. Fie and for shame!
@mb: I think you cover it all. Interesting about the high fat content so the advert being shown out of kids' time anyway!
@jeff: Of course they can air what they like. I defend their right to do so as long as ity is not offensive - genuinely offensive - but the gratuitous offence they've caused by withdrawal is far greater than any offence they could possibly have created by running the ad. It wasn't even a good ad! I cover that in subsequent articles.
What Heinz did was created the entire altar upon which they have chosen to make a blood (ketchup?) sacrifice, and then bound their own hands and walked to it as rather bewildered victims.
I don't care about the gay/straight/bisexual alleged implications here. I don't see that as the issue at all, that is peripheral. I care about bad marketing, and this is bad marketing.
Even so, it's pretty stupid to upset the pink pound. If Kinsey is right then it means that 10% of the buying population is offended (0.6 probability).
But Facebook groups, parliamenary motions, petitions, bombarding of company phone lines etc is a prime example of an over-top-militance that is becoming commonplace in the gay community.
But that's exactly why this subject matter was chosen by AMV BBDO... because it is extremely controversial and topical at the present time... "viral marketing only really works when people have no option but to pass it on to their friends".
As a US media buying exec said to me:
"Advertisers seem to skirt this by using a pop-then-retreat approach. Pop the catchy edgy ad onto YouTube, get noticed, then retreat and say "we're sorry." Everyone hears about it ... and the brand walks away unscathed."
I went shopping on Friday... and stocked up on Branston Baked Beans, Branston Spagetti Hoops and Branston Tomato Ketchup... (The makers of Branston Pickle - a British Fav)
...when I got home I threw out the last few Heinz products I had in my cupboard...
...it felt very liberating, much better than I could have imagined...
...What's incredible, is that I've bought Heinz products all my life... I've never tried an alternative... and the Branston products which I tried over the weekend are actually better... I prefer them!
Post a Comment